Showing posts with label Warner Bros. Discovery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Warner Bros. Discovery. Show all posts

Monday, August 24, 2026

California Expected to Seek TV Channel Sales From Paramount-Warner - Report

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is expected to ask Paramount to divest some cable channels and keep its movie studio separate from Warner Bros.

Paramount Skydance Corp. x Warner Bros. Discovery

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is expected to ask Paramount PSKY to divest some cable channels and commit to keeping its movie studio separate from Warner Bros. before he signs off on the $81 billion merger, people familiar with the matter have told The Wall Street Journal.

Bonta and Paramount Chief Executive David Ellison were scheduled to meet today (Monday, August 24) to discuss potential ways to settle the antitrust lawsuit California and 11 other states filed last month to block a deal that would combine the two entertainment giants.

Lawyers from both sides met Friday (August 21), according to people familiar with the matter. The purpose of that gathering was to lay out an agenda for today’s meeting, including discussions about the cable and motion-picture business, one of the people familiar with the matter said.

However, Bonta canceled the meeting late on Sunday evening, accusing Paramount of "playing games" and leaking what was discussed at Friday's meeting into the public sphere, something Paramount denies doing, with the company saying that they "share AG Bonta’s concerns about the public discussions and misreporting that has surrounded this deal" and that they "remain hopeful and stand ready to continue good faith discussions to resolve the Attorneys General suit and move forward with our plans for increased competition and increased output to the benefit of the talent and entertainment workers."

Leading up to Monday's meeting, people close to the talks between the two sides disclosed to the WSJ that they were doubtful that significant ground would've been made at the meeting.

The lawsuit filed by the states’ attorneys general argued that the merger would create too much concentration in the markets for theatrical movies and cable TV channels. Other areas of concern include film and television production and employment.

Pressure has mounted for Bonta and Ellison to reach an accord to allow the merger to proceed. In recent days, both California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have urged the two sides to find common ground.

Ellison and Paramount face significant financial costs if the deal isn’t closed soon. The deal with Warner includes a “ticking fee” with payments to Warner shareholders of roughly $650 million a quarter starting Oct. 1 and lasting until the transaction closes. If the trial goes on as scheduled, Paramount could be responsible for more than $1 billion in such fees.

Paramount has indicated it is prepared to leave California if it can’t reach an agreement with Bonta and the other states before the ticking fee goes into effect. Tennessee is the company’s first choice for a new home, people familiar with the company’s thinking have said.

Bonta has been adamant that he will fight the deal in court unless Paramount agrees to structural remedies. Paramount has committed to making 30 theatrical releases a year when the deal closes but hasn’t shown a willingness to sell assets or agree to management structures that would limit potential cost-savings and synergies.

A sale or spinoff of even a handful of cable networks could hurt Paramount’s bottom line and make it harder to service the nearly $80 billion in debt it will be carrying once the deal closes. While the cable-network business is struggling with cord-cutting and declining ad revenue, the channels still generate significant cash.

Paramount owns and operates the Nickelodeon whilst Warner Bros. Discovery owns and operates the Cartoon Network.

Bonta also wants Warner Bros.’ movie studio to remain a stand-alone operation with little interference from Ellison, people familiar with the matter said. Taking a hands-off approach to Warner Bros. is a nonstarter for Ellison, a person familiar with his thinking said.

The Paramount-Warner deal was approved by the Justice Department in June. It has also received approvals from the European Union, U.K., China and dozens of other countries.

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources


H/T: Kidscreen; Additional source: Reuters.

Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount News and Highlights!

Sunday, August 16, 2026

Paramount Skydance Satisfies All Regulatory Conditions Under the Merger Agreement to Close Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition, Securing Clearances In Nearly 70 Countries Worldwide

PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE SATISFIES ALL REGULATORY CONDITIONS UNDER THE MERGER AGREEMENT TO CLOSE WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY ACQUISITION, SECURING CLEARANCES IN NEARLY 70 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE

Paramount Skydance Corporation x Warner Bros. Discovery

LOS ANGELES and NEW YORK, Aug. 14, 2026 -- Paramount Skydance Corporation (NASDAQ: PSKY) ("Paramount") has satisfied all regulatory clearances required under the merger agreement to close its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBD) ("WBD").

The eight-month review process has spanned 68 countries worldwide, including the European Union, UK, Australia, Canada, Brazil, China, COMESA, the U.S. Department of Justice and, most recently, Mexico, which announced its clearance today. These independent regulators from across the globe applied the law and market definitions that reflect how audiences consume entertainment and how media companies compete today – and have consistently found no basis to prevent the transaction from moving forward. Paramount and WBD could and would close today and begin delivering the benefits recognized by regulators around the world, theater owners and others across the industry but for the actions of just 12 state attorneys general.

"We are grateful that competition authorities in nearly 70 jurisdictions worldwide have independently and thoroughly reviewed this transaction and reached the same conclusion: it is pro-competitive, pro-consumer and pro-worker," said David Ellison, CEO of Paramount. "Despite this overwhelming global consensus, the litigation brought by the State of California and 11 other State AGs remains the final obstacle to completing a combination that will create a stronger competitor with greater capacity to invest in premium content, support creative talent and workers, and deliver more high-quality entertainment to audiences."  

Paramount urges these 12 State AGs to engage with us in good faith, as we have repeatedly sought to do, to resolve this litigation and clear the way to bring these two companies together.

"While we remain confident that the law and the facts are on our side, we have offered commitments and concessions and remain open to working constructively with the State AGs to find a path forward in the interest of our employees and the creative community in California and across the world – just as we have with the regulators in 68 countries worldwide," said Ellison.  

Rather than support a stronger Hollywood and deliver tangible commitments to invest in for the benefit of labor, talent and other industry participants, the current path the 12 State AGs are on inflicts harm without benefit to their own constituents. The unwarranted eight-plus month additional delay for a trial beyond the engagement of the last 9 months will impose needless costs from penalty fees, litigation expenses and business disruption. As a business with many stakeholders, including pension and state retirement funds, Paramount is required to consider how it can absorb the unnecessary additional financial costs while preserving the longer-term strength of the combined company. The better path would be to resolve this through a settlement that would serve the interests of workers, consumers and the consumers in each of the 12 states.

Across jurisdictions, antitrust regulators examining the same competitive dynamics have reached findings that directly contradict the states AGs' core theories about competition in theatrical film distribution, the range of studios competing in film production, and the competitive pressure facing linear television. What regulators have found:

Competition Overall

THEME: The unanimous clearance of the transaction by competition authorities around the world confirms that the combination of Paramount and WBD does not pose a threat to competition.

  • UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA): The transaction "does not give rise to a realistic prospect of a substantial lessening of competition."

Cable Networks

THEME: As the European Commission, U.S. Department of Justice and others have recognized, the relevant competitive landscape today is not cable-vs-cable, as the 12 State AGs contend, but cable competing directly with streaming and other platforms for audiences.

  • European Commission: "Streaming platforms offering children's content will continue to act as a competitive constraint on the merged entity's TV channels" – rejecting a cable-only competitive landscape.
  • U.S. DOJ: Streaming services "compete aggressively" and place "increasing competitive pressure on legacy linear and broadcast networks."

Theatrical Film Distribution

THEME: Regulators worldwide recognize theatrical film as a broad, dynamic and hit-driven market in which films compete based on their ability to attract audiences – not whether they fall within an artificially narrow "top-grossing" category.

  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC): The transaction is "unlikely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition," with the merged company "constrained by other film studios," including Disney, Sony, Universal, Amazon MGM, StudioCanal, and numerous independent providers.
  • Brazil's CADE: Treated film distribution as "a single relevant market, without additional segmentation" – unlike the 12 State AGs' narrower "top-grossing" theatrical market.
  • COMESA – Eastern & Southern Africa: Described the theatrical film market as "highly competitive, dynamic, and hit-driven," citing the "presence of numerous competitors."

Film Output & Quality

THEME: Regulators found no basis for claims that the transaction will reduce film output or quality – a conclusion further reinforced by Paramount's commitment to release at least 30 high-quality films annually across the combined company.

  • Contrary to the 12 State AGs' claim of "higher prices, lower quality, and less content," the ACCC found the merged company "would still be incentivised to produce and supply a similar number of films, and films of similar quality."

Across markets and continents, independent competition authorities scrutinized every major facet of the transaction – including theatrical distribution, film production, streaming and content licensing – and consistently found robust competition, directly contradicting the artificially narrow market definitions relied on by the state attorneys general.

The judgment of 68 jurisdictions cannot simply be dismissed. Their conclusion is clear: this transaction is lawful, pro-competitive and raises no antitrust concerns. The lawsuit brought by just 12 of 50 State AGs stands alone – contrary to the global regulatory consensus, the facts, the law and sound economic analysis. While we are prepared to make our case at trial, the delay occasioned by this lawsuit is inflicting harm not merely on the two companies involved, but on the broader industry and, ultimately, the very constituents these 12 State AGs represent.

About Paramount, a Skydance Corporation

Paramount, a Skydance Corporation is a next-generation global media and entertainment company, comprised of three business segments: Studios, Direct-to-Consumer, and TV Media. Paramount's portfolio unites legendary brands, including Paramount Pictures, Paramount Television, CBS, CBS News, CBS Sports, Nickelodeon, MTV, BET, Comedy Central, Showtime, Paramount+, Pluto TV, and Skydance Animation, Film, Television, Interactive/Games, and Paramount Sports Entertainment.

PSKY-IR

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains "forward-looking statements" regarding the merger. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of Paramount or WBD. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:  the risk that the closing conditions for the merger will not be satisfied, including the risk that clearances under applicable antitrust or regulatory laws will not be obtained; the possibility that the transaction will not be completed in the expected timeframe or at all; potential adverse effects to the businesses of Paramount or WBD during the pendency of the transaction, such as employee departures or distraction of management from business operations; the risk of stockholder litigation relating to the transaction, including resulting expense or delay; the potential that the expected benefits and opportunities of the merger, if completed, may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected; risks related to Paramount's streaming business; the adverse impact on Paramount's advertising revenues as a result of changes in consumer behavior, advertising market conditions and deficiencies in audience measurement; risks related to operating in highly competitive and dynamic industries; the unpredictable nature of consumer behavior, as well as evolving technologies and distribution models; risks related to Paramount's decisions to invest in new businesses, products, services and technologies, and the evolution of Paramount's business strategy; the potential for loss of carriage or other reduction in, or the impact of negotiations for, the distribution of Paramount's content; damage to Paramount's reputation or brands; losses due to asset impairment charges for goodwill, content and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets; liabilities related to discontinued operations and former businesses; increasing scrutiny of, and evolving expectations for, sustainability initiatives; evolving business continuity, cybersecurity, privacy and data protection and similar risks; challenges in protecting and maintaining Paramount's intellectual property rights; domestic and global political, economic and regulatory factors affecting Paramount's businesses generally; the inability to hire or retain key employees or secure creative talent; disruptions to Paramount's operations as a result of labor disputes; risks and costs associated with the integration of, and Paramount's ability to integrate, the businesses of Paramount Global and Skydance successfully and to achieve anticipated synergies; litigation relating to the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement entered into on July 7, 2024, between Paramount Global and Skydance, potentially resulting in substantial costs; volatility in the price of Paramount's Class B common stock; the effect Paramount's dual-class capital structure and the concentrated ownership may have on the price of its Class B common stock or business; risks related to a private sale of a controlling interest in Paramount, including that Paramount's stockholders may not realize any change of control premium on shares of Paramount's Class B common stock and that Paramount may become subject to the control of a presently unknown third party; risks associated with Paramount's status as a "controlled company" under Nasdaq rules, including its exemption from certain corporate governance requirements; risks associated with the lack of voting rights of Paramount's Class B common stock; risks that anti-takeover provisions in Paramount's amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the "Charter") and amended and restated bylaws, and under Delaware law, could deter, delay, or prevent a change of control; risks that exclusive forum provisions in the Charter could limit a stockholder's choice of forum for certain claims and discourage lawsuits against Paramount's directors and officers; risks that corporate opportunity provisions in the Charter could permit certain persons to pursue competitive opportunities that might otherwise be available to Paramount; risks associated with Paramount's holding company structure, including its dependence on distributions from its subsidiaries to meet tax obligations and other cash requirements; disruptions the merger may cause to Paramount's and WBD's business and commercial relationships; the negative impact that a failure to consummate the merger could have on Paramount's business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price; the risk that the merger may be prevented or delayed or the anticipated benefits reduced if Paramount does not obtain certain regulatory approvals; the risk that the Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms, including if any conditions to the closing of the merger are not satisfied; the risk that litigation relating to the merger could prevent or further delay the closing of the merger or result in the payment of damages after closing; challenges realizing synergies and other anticipated benefits expected from the merger, including integrating WBD's business successfully; risks to Paramount's business, financial condition or results of operations as a result of the incurrence of substantial costs and indebtedness in connection with the merger; and risks of reduced ownership and economic interest by Paramount's existing stockholders as a result of the merger. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors and the general risks associated with the respective businesses of Paramount and WBD can be found in Paramount's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2026, Paramount's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2026, and Paramount's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2026, filed with the SEC on August 4, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and Paramount's subsequent filings with the SEC, and WBD's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026, and WBD's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and WBD's subsequent filings with the SEC. Copies of these filings, as well as subsequent filings, are available online at www.sec.gov, ir.wbd.com or on request from Paramount or WBD. Paramount undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law.

###

Shop Paramount at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources


Official Paramount Skydance Corporation press release courtesy of PR Newswire.

Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount News and Highlights!

Friday, August 07, 2026

Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Gets Green Light From U.K. Government

The U.K. has cleared Paramount Skydance’s $111 ⁠billion acquisition of Warner Bros. on both competition and ⁠public interest grounds after Paramount beefed up promises ​about ​programming ⁠and news provision in the country.

Paramount x Warner Bros. Discover

In a statement, the U.K.’s Department of Culture, Media and Sport said, “Today, the Competition and Markets Authority have announced their decision that there are no competition aspects of this proposed merger in the U.K. which necessitate their further intervention.”

Among the areas that the CMA looked at were theatrical film distribution, linear children’s TV channels and the supply of subscription VOD services.

The DCMS added that Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, had decided “not to issue a Public Interest Intervention Notice on the basis that the assurances and further legally-binding commitments she has secured at this point from Paramount provide a set of protections that will help safeguard the continued availability of a diverse range of broadcasting and on-demand services in the U.K.; the continuation of their distinct editorial identities; and, the distinct editorial identities of key U.K. news programs.”

The U.K. government received the following assurances from Paramount:

  • Media and streaming services: “Paramount set out clear intentions not to consolidate the Combined Group’s linear channels with its on-demand services in the U.K., and Paramount has made a commitment that they shall retain their distinct editorial identity.”
  • Children’s programming: “Paramount has promised that its children’s channels, including Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network, shall remain editorially distinct and continue to commission and acquire original U.K. children’s content.”
  • News plurality and editorial independence: “Paramount has promised to ensure that Channel 5 News maintains its editorial independence, that its editorial direction shall remain entirely separate from CBS News and CNN International, and that CNN International will continue to be available in the U.K. In addition, it has given assurances that the provider of Channel 5 News will continue to have editorial control and independence over news programming and that bona fide licensees will enjoy continued access to the CNN, CBS News and Channel 5 news archives on standard commercial terms.”
  • Channel 5 and U.K. investment: “Paramount has committed that Channel 5 will continue to operate as a Public Service Broadcaster fulfilling its PSB license obligations. Channel 5’s commissioning strategy will remain focused on the U.K., with Paramount committing more funding to support high-quality news, original children’s programming and drama.”

Reacting to the U.K. decision, Paramount placed it in the context of its antitrust showdown in March 2027 against California attorney general Rob Bonta and his coalition of 11 other state AGs. “These conclusions further demonstrate the misguided and gerrymandered market definitions relied upon by the U.S. state AGs in their antitrust complaint in California,” a Paramount spokesperson said.

Below is the official statement issued by the U.K.’s Department of Culture, Media and Sport:

Public statement- Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery by Paramount: decision of no intervention on Public Interest Intervention or Foreign State Influence grounds

The Culture Secretary has decided not to intervene on the basis of assurances and legally-binding commitments she has secured from Paramount.

From: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Published: 6 August 2026

Details

Public statement

On 30 June 2026, DCMS wrote to Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery on behalf of the Culture Secretary informing them, under the Enterprise Act public interest regime, that she was minded to intervene in the proposed merger between the two companies on the basis that the merger may impact on media plurality in the UK, including in relation to children’s programming, editorial independence and news media. The Secretary of State also issued a Written Ministerial Statement to this effect in Parliament. Both the “minded to” letter and the parliamentary statement were clear about the Secretary of State’s concerns in relation to this proposed transaction. 

The parties were given the opportunity to make representations to the Secretary of State by 6 July in response to her concerns. Paramount put forward a set of assurances seeking to address the issues raised by the Secretary of State. These assurances included a range of commitments on future investment in the UK, maintaining the distinct editorial identities of key services and the editorial independence of news. Following further discussions with DCMS officials, Paramount offered to strengthen those assurances and turn them into legally-binding commitments by way of a ‘deed of undertaking’ made in the Secretary of State’s favour.

Today, the Competition and Markets Authority have announced their decision that there are no competition aspects of this proposed merger in the UK which necessitate their further intervention.

In parallel, after careful consideration, the Secretary of State has decided not to issue a Public Interest Intervention Notice (PIIN) on the basis that the assurances and further legally-binding commitments she has secured at this point from Paramount provide a set of protections that will help safeguard the continued availability of a diverse range of broadcasting and on-demand services in the UK; the continuation of their distinct editorial identities; and, the distinct editorial identities of key UK news programmes.

Paramount has committed to providing the Secretary of State with annual statements of compliance with the undertakings in the deed and DCMS will closely monitor their implementation. In the circumstances, she has decided to accept the deed and has informed the parties of her decision. She will update Parliament of her decisions formally when it returns from Summer Recess in September.

The Secretary of State has taken this decision based on the specific powers she currently has available to her under the Enterprise Act, which only relate to matters concerning UK broadcasting and news media landscape. As set out in the “Watch this Space” Green Paper published on 23 June, the media sector is undergoing a profound and rapid transformation. The Secretary of State believes it is of the utmost importance to protect plurality, diversity and distinct British voices across our wider creative industries, including film, and shares the concerns about the impact consolidation could have on the UK’s creative industries.

She will be meeting with Paramount in the coming weeks with a view to seek assurances about the impact of this proposed deal on the wider creative industries. Beyond this the Secretary of State is also considering all avenues - ranging from changes to existing powers to further legislation should it be necessary - to ensure the government has the ability to protect plurality, diversity and British content when it is under threat.

Assurances from Paramount

A copy of the letter of assurances from Paramount and the Deed can be found on GOV.UK.. The main assurances are:

  • Media and streaming services: The assurances offered by Paramount set out clear intentions not to consolidate the Combined Group’s linear channels with its on-demand services in the UK, and Paramount has made a commitment that they shall retain their distinct editorial identity.
  • Children’s programming: Paramount has also promised that its children’s channels, including Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network, shall remain editorially distinct and continue to commission and acquire original UK children’s content.
  • News plurality and editorial independence: Paramount has promised to ensure that Channel 5 News maintains its editorial independence, that its editorial direction shall remain entirely separate from CBS News and CNN International, and that CNN International will continue to be available in the UK. In addition, it has given assurances that the provider of Channel 5 News will continue to have editorial control and independence over news programming and that bona fide licensees will enjoy continued access to the CNN, CBS News and Channel 5 news archives on standard commercial terms.
  • Channel 5 and UK Investment: Paramount has also committed that Channel 5 will continue to operate as a Public Service Broadcaster fulfilling its PSB licence obligations. Channel 5’s commissioning strategy will remain focussed on the UK, with Paramount committing more funding to support high-quality news, original children’s programming and drama.

Video-on-demand services

The Secretary of State’s Written Ministerial Statement noted that should she decide to intervene in this case, she would bring forward secondary legislation to amend the plurality of control public interest consideration set out in the Enterprise Act, to enable Ofcom to examine the impact of the proposed acquisition on video-on-demand services. While DCMS will no longer be bringing forward secondary legislation in relation to this specific merger, the Secretary of State may do so in future, given the role on-demand viewing now plays in the market.  

Foreign state influence regime

Having considered the proposed merger under the statutory Foreign State Influence regime, the Secretary of State has concluded that she does not have reasonable grounds to suspect that her duty to issue a Foreign State Intervention Notice has arisen. She is therefore currently not minded to intervene in this case. The Secretary of State will reassess the position if any new information comes to light suggesting otherwise.

Notes to editors

How long do Paramount’s commitments last?

The commitments in the deed are to come into effect on the date on which the transaction completes, and to remain effective for a period of five years. Commitments relating to Channel 5 will remain in effect until 31 December 2034, when Channel 5’s current public service broadcasting licence ends.

What about film and cinema?

Under the Enterprise Act 2002, the Secretary of State’s role in this merger process is strictly defined. Her powers of intervention are limited specifically to Public Interest considerations, which focus on issues such as media plurality and editorial independence. Issues relating to the effect of the merger on film and cinema are for the CMA to examine, as the responsible body for assessing the competition aspects of the merger.

--Ends--

Below is Paramount Skydance Corporation's official press release announcing the news, courtesy of PR Newswire:

UK COMPETITION AND MARKETS AUTHORITY APPROVES PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE CORPORATION ACQUISITION OF WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY

LOS ANGELES and NEW YORK, Aug. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The United Kingdom Competition and Markets Authority has today formally cleared the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBD) ("WBD") by Paramount Skydance Corporation (NASDAQ: PSKY) ("Paramount"), representing an important milestone in completing the transaction.

Paramount is grateful to the CMA for its constructive engagement and its review of the transaction.

Separately, Paramount has entered into a deed of covenant and undertaking with the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. Paramount welcomed the opportunity to engage with DCMS and is pleased to have agreed on a path forward.

Paramount has already received competition clearances from antitrust and competition authorities in: the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Kuwait, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, and by the European Commission, and the COMESA Competition Commission.

Additionally, Paramount has received foreign direct investment clearances in Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Germany, France, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, Spain, and Slovenia. The transaction was also unconditionally approved by European Commission under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation regime and by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority under its media merger control regime.

With the clearance from the Competition and Markets Authority, bodies and governments representing 66 jurisdictions have either cleared the transaction or chosen not to challenge it on competition and/or foreign direct investment grounds.

These clearances recognize that the combination of Paramount and WBD will enhance consumer choice and enable a creative-first company to invest in more projects and bring stories to audiences worldwide. It will create a scaled media and entertainment company capable of competing with the tech companies that have come to dominate the industry, strengthening the media ecosystem and creating more opportunities for creatives both in front of and behind the camera.

As we have noted, this transaction does not raise antitrust concerns in any market. Today's clearance by the CMA further reinforces that. Similar to the European Commission, which cleared the transaction on 22 July 2026 after months of careful review, the conclusions reached by the CMA directly refute the assumptions that underpin the US state AGs' complaint seeking to block the transaction, despite federal approval. When considering theatrical film distribution, the CMA concluded that the merged entity "would continue to face competition from these three major studios and a range of other smaller studios." At several points, the CMA review considered how other forms of content distribution directly compete with SVOD.  Moreover, in its assessment of linear cable and in particular children's TV channels, the CMA highlighted the competitive constraint from free-to-air channels and children's content available via SVOD, and in relation to the supply of SVOD services, the constraint imposed by broadcast video on demand services and other SVOD suppliers. These conclusions further demonstrate the misguided and gerrymandered market definitions relied upon by the US state AGs in their antitrust complaint in California. 

About Paramount, a Skydance Corporation

Paramount, a Skydance Corporation is a next-generation global media and entertainment company, comprised of three business segments: Studios, Direct-to-Consumer, and TV Media. Paramount's portfolio unites legendary brands, including Paramount Pictures, Paramount Television, CBS, CBS News, CBS Sports, Nickelodeon, MTV, BET, Comedy Central, Showtime, Paramount+, Pluto TV, and Skydance Animation, Film, Television, Interactive/Games, and Paramount Sports Entertainment.

PSKY-IR

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains "forward-looking statements" regarding the merger. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of Paramount or WBD. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:  the risk that the closing conditions for the merger will not be satisfied, including the risk that clearances under applicable antitrust or regulatory laws will not be obtained; the possibility that the transaction will not be completed in the expected timeframe or at all; potential adverse effects to the businesses of Paramount or WBD during the pendency of the transaction, such as employee departures or distraction of management from business operations; the risk of stockholder litigation relating to the transaction, including resulting expense or delay; the potential that the expected benefits and opportunities of the merger, if completed, may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected; risks related to Paramount's streaming business; the adverse impact on Paramount's advertising revenues as a result of changes in consumer behavior, advertising market conditions and deficiencies in audience measurement; risks related to operating in highly competitive and dynamic industries; the unpredictable nature of consumer behavior, as well as evolving technologies and distribution models; risks related to Paramount's decisions to invest in new businesses, products, services and technologies, and the evolution of Paramount's business strategy; the potential for loss of carriage or other reduction in, or the impact of negotiations for, the distribution of Paramount's content; damage to Paramount's reputation or brands; losses due to asset impairment charges for goodwill, content and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets; liabilities related to discontinued operations and former businesses; increasing scrutiny of, and evolving expectations for, sustainability initiatives; evolving business continuity, cybersecurity, privacy and data protection and similar risks; challenges in protecting and maintaining Paramount's intellectual property rights; domestic and global political, economic and regulatory factors affecting Paramount's businesses generally; the inability to hire or retain key employees or secure creative talent; disruptions to Paramount's operations as a result of labor disputes; risks and costs associated with the integration of, and Paramount's ability to integrate, the businesses of Paramount Global and Skydance successfully and to achieve anticipated synergies; litigation relating to the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement entered into on July 7, 2024, between Paramount Global and Skydance, potentially resulting in substantial costs; volatility in the price of Paramount's Class B common stock; the effect Paramount's dual-class capital structure and the concentrated ownership may have on the price of its Class B common stock or business; risks related to a private sale of a controlling interest in Paramount, including that Paramount's stockholders may not realize any change of control premium on shares of Paramount's Class B common stock and that Paramount may become subject to the control of a presently unknown third party; risks associated with Paramount's status as a "controlled company" under Nasdaq rules, including its exemption from certain corporate governance requirements; risks associated with the lack of voting rights of Paramount's Class B common stock; risks that anti-takeover provisions in Paramount's amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the "Charter") and amended and restated bylaws, and under Delaware law, could deter, delay, or prevent a change of control; risks that exclusive forum provisions in the Charter could limit a stockholder's choice of forum for certain claims and discourage lawsuits against Paramount's directors and officers; risks that corporate opportunity provisions in the Charter could permit certain persons to pursue competitive opportunities that might otherwise be available to Paramount; risks associated with Paramount's holding company structure, including its dependence on distributions from its subsidiaries to meet tax obligations and other cash requirements; disruptions the merger may cause to Paramount's and WBD's business and commercial relationships; the negative impact that a failure to consummate the merger could have on Paramount's business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price; the risk that the merger may be prevented or delayed or the anticipated benefits reduced if Paramount does not obtain certain regulatory approvals; the risk that the Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms, including if any conditions to the closing of the merger are not satisfied; the risk that litigation relating to the merger could prevent or further delay the closing of the merger or result in the payment of damages after closing; challenges realizing synergies and other anticipated benefits expected from the merger, including integrating WBD's business successfully; risks to Paramount's business, financial condition or results of operations as a result of the incurrence of substantial costs and indebtedness in connection with the merger; and risks of reduced ownership and economic interest by Paramount's existing stockholders as a result of the merger. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors and the general risks associated with the respective businesses of Paramount and WBD can be found in Paramount's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2026, Paramount's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2026, and Paramount's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2026, filed with the SEC on August 4, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and Paramount's subsequent filings with the SEC, and WBD's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026, and WBD's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and WBD's subsequent filings with the SEC. Copies of these filings, as well as subsequent filings, are available online at www.sec.gov, ir.wbd.com or on request from Paramount or WBD. Paramount undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law.

###

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources


Source: Variety; H/T: Special thanks to RegularCapital for the news!

Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount News and Highlights!

Saturday, July 25, 2026

Paramount Agrees To Not Close Warner Bros. Discovery Transaction Until Next Year - Or Until Lawsuit Merits Are Resolved

Paramount has agreed not to close its proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery until Tuesday, June 1, 2027, or until shortly after the merits of lawsuits brought by state attorneys general and the Writers Guild of America are resolved.

Paramount Skydance Corporation x Warner Bros. Discovery

The agreement is an extraordinary new development in the merger transaction, which has won regulatory approval from the federal government and European regulators.

After a court filing spelling out the agreement came during the last hour of trading on Wall Street, shares in Paramount added to what was already a lackluster day. They fell 3.3% on the day to finish at $8.21 after touching a 52-week low of $8.17. The stock slid another penny in after-hours trading.

Click here to read Paramount’s agreement not to close the transaction as legal proceedings take place.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin this week granted the states a temporary restraining order pausing the transaction for 14 days to hold a hearing on whether to grant a lengthier preliminary injunction. She later extended the TRO by another 14 days, through Monday, August 17. Now both sides have indicated that they want to schedule a trial.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, in a statement on social media, called the agreement “a major victory for a free and fair economy, for the entertainment industry, for workers, for consumers, and for affordability.” He planned to share additional thoughts with the media at a Friday (July 24) afternoon press briefing.

Hanging over the legal proceedings has been the prospect that Paramount would be on the hook to pay a $7 million-per-day “ticking fee” to Warner Bros Discovery for every day that the transaction does not close past Wednesday, September 30. The agreement opens the very real possibility that legal proceedings will extend well beyond that date. There is a $7 billion breakup fee if the deal falls apart.

In their filing in federal court Friday, the attorneys for the parties wrote, “The transaction at issue in State of California and Writers Guild shall not close, be consummated, or otherwise be completed and Defendants will not take any steps, directly or indirectly, to integrate or consolidate their operations pursuant to the Transaction until the earlier of (1) five days after the merits determination in these matters, or (2) June 1, 2027. This stipulation and order extends to Defendants’ agents, officers, servants, employees, attorneys, and other persons who are in active concert or participation with Defendants.”

A Paramount spokesperson said, “Today’s agreement is a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset: a direct path to a trial based on the evidence. This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators, a conclusion dozens of competition authorities around the world have already reached. Plaintiffs’ market definitions bear no relationship to the realities of today’s marketplace and cannot withstand scrutiny. We look forward to proving our case at trial.”

The judge still has to sign off on the plan, but she had asked attorneys for the plaintiffs and defendants to meet to try to agree to a schedule.

In a joint statement on the agreement, the WGA West and WGA East said, “Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery today agreed to what the state Attorneys General and the WGA both sought from the court: the merger will be put on hold pending the outcome of the states’ and the WGA’s cases or until June 1, 2027, whichever comes first. It remains our view that this merger is unlawful, and we will continue the fight to block it.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James, representing one of a dozen seeking to block the transaction, said in a statement, “From the workers and artists who bring stories to life to the families who buy tickets at the box office, Paramount’s illegal takeover of Warner Bros. is a bad deal for all those who count on a competitive entertainment industry. Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries. I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”

The sides also agreed to scrap the current briefing schedule, as well as an August 3 hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction. They also agreed to file a joint statement regarding the scheduling of a trial by July 31.

The state attorneys general sued July 13 to block the transaction, claiming that it would stifle competition for wide release theatrical film distribution, anticipated big budget blockbusters, and basic cable television channel licensing. The WGA filed its own suit a day later, contending that the merger would illegally limit competition for writers services.

Paramount called the state AGs lawsuit a “flawed application of the antitrust laws and is wrong on both the facts and the law. We will vigorously defend the transaction and demonstrate that this challenge is inconsistent with sound competition policy and the competitive realities of the media marketplace.”

Original source: Deadline.

More from Variety:

Paramount Agrees to Postpone Warner Bros. Merger Until After Antitrust Trial

Paramount Skydance has reached an agreement with a coalition of state attorneys general to postpone the Warner Bros. Discovery merger until after an antitrust trial.

The company entered a joint stipulation in the federal case on Friday afternoon agreeing not to close the $111 billion transaction until five days after a trial is held or June 1, 2027, whichever is earlier. No trial date has been set, but the agreement likely puts the merger on hold for at least several months.

A coalition of 12 states, led by California, obtained a temporary restraining order earlier this week that blocks the merger from closing for 28 days, pending the outcome of motion for a preliminary injunction. The states allege that the deal will reduce competition in the cable and theatrical markets, and should be blocked.

“Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries,” said New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, in a statement. “I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, meanwhile, declared the agreement a “tremendous win.”

“Our argument against this illegal merger is straightforward: When too few corporations have too much power in markets central to American life, it makes things more expensive, and it makes things worse,” he said. “Today’s agreement is great news for audiences, movie theaters, and the many people who write, build, and create the art, news, and entertainment so many of us enjoy. We are eager to continue to make our case in court and celebrate another tremendous win in our effort to ensure this unlawful merger never sees the light of day.”

Norm Eisen, co-founder of the Democracy Defenders Fund and a member of the #BlocktheMerger campaign, also hailed the agreement as a victory for grassroots opposition to the deal.

“The Ellisons believed their relationship with President Trump would help them push through a disastrous deal that threatened democracy, creative freedom, and independent journalism. We in the #BlocktheMerger campaign helped prove them wrong,” he said. “This collective resistance is turning the tide.”

Paramount had been keen to close the deal before Sept. 30, when it will begin to incur a $7-million-a-day “ticking fee” to be paid to Warner Bros. investors. The agreement is a tacit acknowledgement that that will not happen, barring a settlement with the states.

Paramount previously sought a three-day hearing on the injunction motion in late August, hoping to win the judge’s blessing to close the deal sometime in early September.

But the states resisted that idea, saying they would need more time to take discovery and prepare for a full trial on the merits. The states were due to file their injunction motion on Thursday night, but held off as the two sides held discussions on a path forward.

In a statement, the company said the agreement is a “significant win.”

“Today’s agreement is a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset: a direct path to a trial based on the evidence,” a Paramount spokesperson said. “This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators, a conclusion dozens of competition authorities around the world have already reached. Plaintiffs’ market definitions bear no relationship to the realities of today’s marketplace and cannot withstand scrutiny. We look forward to proving our case at trial.”

A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 3 in federal court in Oakland, at which point the two sides were expected to argue over the injunction motion. The two sides agreed to cancel that hearing.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin approved the joint stipulation on Friday afternoon, about an hour after it was entered.

The Writers Guild of America filed its own motion for an injunction earlier this week, which was also set to be heard on Aug. 3. That motion has been withdrawn, as Paramount has effectively conceded that it will not close the deal until a determination of the merits of the antitrust claims.

The parties also agreed to submit a joint stipulation by July 31 on their respective positions on trial scheduling. The states previously proposed to hold the trial in April 2027.

###

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources



Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount News and Highlights!

Thursday, July 23, 2026

European Commission Approves Paramount Skydance Corporation Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Marking Major Milestone Towards Completion

EUROPEAN COMMISSION APPROVES PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE CORPORATION ACQUISITION OF WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY MARKING MAJOR MILESTONE TOWARDS COMPLETION

Paramount, A Skydance Corporation Logo

LOS ANGELES and NEW YORK, July 22, 2026 -- The European Commission has today formally cleared the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: WBD) ("WBD") by Paramount Skydance Corporation (NASDAQ: PSKY) ("Paramount"), representing a major milestone in completing the transaction in line with the publicly stated timeline.

Paramount has already received competition clearances from antitrust and competition authorities in the following jurisdictions: the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Kuwait, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, and the COMESA Competition Commission (the regional competition authority for the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa). Additionally, Paramount has received foreign direct investment clearances in Australia, Germany, France, Spain, Slovenia, Belgium, Czechia, New Zealand, Italy, and Romania. The transaction was also unconditionally approved by European Commission under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation regime and by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority under its media merger control regime.

With the clearance from the European Commission, bodies and governments representing 65 jurisdictions have either cleared the transaction or chosen not to challenge it on competition and/or foreign direct investment grounds.

These clearances recognize that the combination of Paramount and WBD will enhance consumer choice and enable a creative-first company to invest in more projects and bring stories to audiences worldwide. It will create a scaled media and entertainment company capable of competing with the tech companies that have come to dominate the industry, strengthening the media ecosystem and creating more opportunities for creatives both in front of and behind the camera.

The conclusions reached by the European Commission directly refute key assumptions that underpin the state AGs' complaint seeking to block the transaction. In its finding that "at film production level, enough film studios remain as competitors in the EEA", the European Commission correctly defined the market as including "smaller US studios such as Amazon MGM, A24 and Lionsgate, as well as European studios" in addition to "other major US studios like Disney, NBC Universal and Sony." The European Commission did not find that high-budget or 'blockbuster' films constituted a relevant market. It rather considered them as an element of differentiation in its competitive assessment, and found that the market will remain competitive for these types of films too. In coming to the conclusion that "as regards the AV value chain, the Commission's investigation showed that enough alternative competitors remain to exert sufficient competitive pressure on the merged entity in the EEA", the European Commission rightly considered streaming platforms as competing directly with linear TV. These conclusions further undermine the market definition relied upon by the state AGs in their complaint. 

"Today's approval from the European Commission marks another significant milestone in bringing Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery together. We appreciate the Commission's constructive engagement and thorough analysis throughout its review," said Makan Delrahim, Chief Legal Officer, Paramount. "Not only does this combination not pose any competitive harms, it actually enhances competition by creating a scaled media and entertainment company with the ability to truly challenge the tech platforms that have come to dominate the industry. By strengthening competition it will support increased investment in content, expand opportunities for creatives and deliver greater choice for consumers. We are pleased that the European Commission, following its robust review, joins other bodies, including the United States Department of Justice, Australia's ACCC, Canada's CCB, Brazil's CADE, China's SAMR and South Africa, in concluding that this transaction does not harm competition and can proceed, further underscoring its potential to strengthen the global media and entertainment ecosystem."

The transaction brings together the two companies' complementary strengths to create more competition and support greater investment in storytelling and talent. Paramount has proactively made clear its plans and incentives for the combined company: to increase output to at least 30 high-quality films annually, each of which will receive a full theatrical release starting immediately; to continue licensing content to and acquiring content from third parties; and to preserve iconic brands with independent creative leadership.

***

About Paramount, a Skydance Corporation

Paramount, a Skydance Corporation is a next-generation global media and entertainment company, comprised of three business segments: Studios, Direct-to-Consumer, and TV Media. PSKY's portfolio unites legendary brands, including Paramount Pictures, Paramount Television, CBS, CBS News, CBS Sports, Nickelodeon, MTV, BET, Comedy Central, Showtime, Paramount+, Pluto TV, and Skydance Animation, Film, Television, Interactive/Games, and Paramount Sports Entertainment.

PSKY-IR

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This communication contains "forward-looking statements" regarding the Merger. The reader is cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections of PSKY or WBD. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the risk that the closing conditions for the Merger will not be satisfied, including the risk that clearances under applicable antitrust or regulatory laws will not be obtained; the possibility that the transaction will not be completed in the expected timeframe or at all; potential adverse effects to the businesses of PSKY or WBD during the pendency of the transaction, such as employee departures or distraction of management from business operations; the risk of stockholder litigation relating to the transaction, including resulting expense or delay; the potential that the expected benefits and opportunities of the Merger, if completed, may not be realized or may take longer to realize than expected; risks related to PSKY's streaming business; the adverse impact on PSKY's advertising revenues as a result of changes in consumer behavior, advertising market conditions and deficiencies in audience measurement; risks related to operating in highly competitive and dynamic industries; the unpredictable nature of consumer behavior, as well as evolving technologies and distribution models; risks related to PSKY's decisions to invest in new businesses, products, services and technologies, and the evolution of PSKY's business strategy; the potential for loss of carriage or other reduction in, or the impact of negotiations for, the distribution of PSKY's content; damage to PSKY's reputation or brands; losses due to asset impairment charges for goodwill, content and long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets; liabilities related to discontinued operations and former businesses; increasing scrutiny of, and evolving expectations for, sustainability initiatives; evolving business continuity, cybersecurity, privacy and data protection and similar risks; challenges in protecting and maintaining PSKY's intellectual property rights; domestic and global political, economic and regulatory factors affecting PSKY's businesses generally; the inability to hire or retain key employees or secure creative talent; disruptions to PSKY's operations as a result of labor disputes; risks and costs associated with the integration of, and PSKY's ability to integrate, the businesses of Paramount Global and Skydance successfully and to achieve anticipated synergies; litigation relating to the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement entered into on July 7, 2024, between Paramount Global and Skydance, potentially resulting in substantial costs; volatility in the price of PSKY's Class B common stock; the effect PSKY's dual-class capital structure and the concentrated ownership may have on the price of its Class B common stock or business; risks related to a private sale of a controlling interest in PSKY, including that PSKY's stockholders may not realize any change of control premium on shares of PSKY's Class B common stock and that PSKY may become subject to the control of a presently unknown third party; risks associated with PSKY's status as a "controlled company" under Nasdaq rules, including its exemption from certain corporate governance requirements; risks associated with the lack of voting rights of PSKY's Class B common stock; risks that anti-takeover provisions in PSKY's amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the "Charter") and amended and restated bylaws, and under Delaware law, could deter, delay, or prevent a change of control; risks that exclusive forum provisions in the Charter could limit a stockholder's choice of forum for certain claims and discourage lawsuits against PSKY's directors and officers; risks that corporate opportunity provisions in the Charter could permit certain persons to pursue competitive opportunities that might otherwise be available to PSKY; risks associated with PSKY's holding company structure, including its dependence on distributions from its subsidiaries to meet tax obligations and other cash requirements; risks related to PSKY's indebtedness, including PSKY's substantial outstanding debt obligations; risks related to PSKY's ability to incur substantially more debt and PSKY's ability to meet the financial and other covenants contained in the agreements governing PSKY's indebtedness; risks relating to PSKY's ability to deleverage the business in accordance with management's targets, including risks arising from assumptions, uncertainties and contingencies that may affect PSKY's ability to reduce indebtedness; risks relating to management's ability to execute on its strategic plan and improve its financial profile and cash flows from operations; and risks relating to any capital or other financing PSKY may have to raise in order to reduce its indebtedness following the Merger. A further list and description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors and the general risks associated with the respective businesses of PSKY and WBD can be found in PSKY's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2026, and PSKY's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 4, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and PSKY's subsequent filings with the SEC, and WBD's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2026, and WBD's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2026, including, in each case, in the sections captioned "Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors," and WBD's subsequent filings with the SEC. Copies of these filings, as well as subsequent filings, are available online at www.sec.gov, ir.wbd.com or on request from PSKY or WBD. PSKY undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information or future events or developments, except as required by law. 

###

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources


Official Paramount Skydance Corporation press release courtesy of PR Newswire.

Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount News and Highlights!

Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Paramount Asks FCC to Sign Off on Middle East Investment in Warner Bros. Megamerger

The company says that the Ellisons and RedBird will control the voting stock, but that "indirect foreign ownership of equity interests in Paramount will be approximately 49.5 percent."

David Ellison, Chairman & CEO, Paramount Skydance speaks on stage during New York Upfront Partnership Event 2026 at Storied NYC on April 22, 2026 in New York City
David Ellison, Chairman & CEO, Paramount Skydance speaks on stage during New York Upfront Partnership Event 2026 at Storied NYC on April 22, 2026 in New York City Photo by Noam Galai/Getty Images for Paramount

Paramount has asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to sign off on its equity investment from three prominent Middle East sovereign wealth funds that are backing the company’s $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

In a petition for declaratory ruling to the FCC signed by Paramount legal chief Makan Delrahim, Paramount asks the Brendan Carr-led commission to sign off on the deal involving Saudi Arabia’s PIF (public investment fund), L’Imad, an Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund, and a Qatar Investment Authority fund.

Paramount notes that David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison, as well as RedBird Capital, will control all voting shares in the company, and that the sovereign funds are only acquiring non-voting equity shares.

“Upon consummation of the Proposed Investment, Petitioner expects that the aggregate indirect foreign ownership of equity interests in Paramount will be approximately 49.5 percent,” Paramount writes, underscoring the extent to which the company is leaning on the foreign investment.

Paramount is asking for a ruling that would allow up to 100 percent of equity or voting shares to be owned by foreign holders, though that is a procedural maneuver rather than a sign of any future plans. The FCC approval only applies to the foreign financing, not to the deal itself, which secured WBD shareholder approval last week.

“Paramount has filed a customary petition for a declaratory ruling with the FCC relating to the indirect foreign investment in Paramount’s broadcast television stations as a result of the recent equity syndication,” a Paramount spokesperson told The Hollywood Reporter. “An FCC filing is completely standard for investments such as this and is not a condition to closing Paramount’s acquisition of WBD.

“When the transaction and equity syndication close, the Ellison family and RedBird will collectively hold the largest equity stake in the combined company and continue to be the sole owners of Class A Common Stock, representing 100% of the voting shares, with no other equity syndication party having any governance rights, voting shares, or Board representation,” the statement continues. “The combination of Paramount and WBD’s complementary assets will enhance competition while creating a strong champion for creative talent and consumer choice.”

The three Middle East funds were reported to be providing $24 billion of capital to back the Warners deal. The FCC filing confirms that the PIF will be the largest contributor, owning 15.1% of Paramount’s equity after the deal closes, with L’Imad owning 12.8%, and Qatar’s fund owning 10.6%. Collectively those three funds will control 38.5% of Paramount equity shares (again, non-voting shares). The remaining foreign equity owners include passive investors in RedBird funds, and entities that have acquired Paramount shares and have filed Form 13F with the SEC.

Paramount is also giving answers to the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector (sometimes called “Team Telecom”), which advises the FCC on national security and law enforcement concerns.

In the filing, Delrahim argued that the foreign investment will ultimately serve to bolster the company’s local news programming, improve its technology stack, and increase the diversity of programming, citing the deal for UFC fights as an example.

“Reducing barriers to further investment in Paramount, including by allowing the company to pursue additional capital from non-U.S. investors, will enable it to allocate additional resources to preserve and enhance the legacy and broad reach of the Licensees’ television broadcast operations,” Delrahim wrote. “In turn, Paramount’s ability to compete in the television broadcast and broader video marketplaces will improve, thereby promoting the strength of the industry overall. The new equity investment, leveraged on the efficiency gains resulting from the Paramount-Skydance transaction, will better position the company to weather continuing challenges facing broadcasters and operators of linear pay-television networks.”

Monday, May 18, 2026

Paramount’s Warner Bros. Discovery Takeover Expected To Breach Its SkyShowtime Venture With Comcast - Report

Paramount’s $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) is expected to create complications for its SkyShowtime partnership with Comcast, Deadline reports.

SkyShowtime Logo

Industry sources said Paramount’s proposed ownership of HBO Max will likely put the David Ellison-run company in breach of its joint venture agreement for SkyShowtime, a streaming service available in 22 European markets, boasting more than 9 million subscribers, per insiders.

SkyShowtime declined to comment. Paramount declined to comment on “speculation” regarding SkyShowtime. Comcast did not respond to a request for comment.

Deadline understands that the 50-50 pact between Paramount and Comcast means they do not compete with SkyShowtime in the territories where the streamer is available.

Paramount+ is accessible in seven European markets, but there is no overlap with SkyShowtime. Indeed, Paramount+ withdrew from Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland in 2022 to make way for SkyShowtime. Comcast has not rolled out Peacock internationally, and SkyShowtime is not available in the UK, where the company owns Sky.

Paramount absorbing HBO Max would significantly change this dynamic. HBO Max operates in 21 of SkyShowtime’s 22 markets, including key territories such as Spain and the Nordics. Ellison has signalled that he intends to combine Paramount+ and HBO Max. “That would go against the whole joint venture thing,” said a well-placed person.

Sources close to SkyShowtime said Paramount’s WBD deal had created palpable uncertainty among employees, leading to speculation about how the mega-merger will affect SkyShowtime’s shareholder structure.

Change is anticipated, with sources suggesting that it would make sense for Paramount to take over the SkyShowtime arrangement, or at least become the dominant partner. Comcast co-CEO Mike Cavanagh indicated as recently as March that the company was focused on its U.S. streaming strategy.

“A scenario in which Paramount assumes full control of the [SkyShowtime] platform and integrates it into its operations in EMEA is increasingly viewed as a likely strategic outcome,” said a source familiar with the thinking.

Paramount is currently seeking regulatory approval for the WBD deal and has said that it expects the acquisition to close in the third quarter of this year.

Deadline revealed last year that Paramount and Comcast have invested at least $1 billion into SkyShowtime since its launch, but sources said they do get a return on their investment because the streamer buys their content and generates subscription and ad revenue. 

SkyShowtime is stocked with series like Sky Studios’ The Day of the Jackal and Taylor Sheridan’s Yellowstone, which has been a driver of subscriptions. It also hosts originals, such as Swedish drama Where the Sun Always Shines, which recently cast Game of Thrones star Kristofer Hivju, along with the latest Star Trek series, and a library of Nickelodeon shows. The streamer made an operating loss of €543.7M ($632M) in 2024, which was 3% down on 2023, when its losses stood at €561.9M.

SkyShowtime is based out of Sky’s campus on the outskirts of central London, but brought together its 300 employees for an all-hands offsite meeting in Budapest in January. Those present said Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Monty Sarhan was in an ebullient mood, high-fiving employees, talking up the company’s performance, and committing to a new set of leadership pledges.

According to a copy of the commitments seen by Deadline, they included the pledge: “Try to maintain a positive and optimistic outlook, even in the face of challenges. Things are never as good – or as bad – as we think they are.”

Sources said this has not been straightforward amid shareholder uncertainty, and that some internal employee mood metrics have been below benchmarks. SkyShowtime’s position is that employee feedback after the Budapest gathering was “overwhelmingly positive.”

A Paramount spokesperson said: “SkyShowtime continues to operate under its established joint venture agreement. We don’t comment on speculation about contractual matters between shareholders.”

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources


Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon International and Paramount Plus News and Highlights!

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Paramount Defends Warner Bros. Discovery Merger In Letter To California AG

Paramount defended its proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery to California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who is considering an antitrust challenge to the transaction.

Paramount+ and HBO Max Logos
Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery

In a letter to Bonta last week, Paramount’s chief legal officer, Makan Delrahim, said that the combined companies would have the incentive to boost theatrical distribution, not reduce it.

Delrahim wrote, “Paramount’s proposed merger with WBD will help drive meaningful improvements for movie theaters and their audiences. To compete more effectively with Netflix, and others leading services, a combined Paramount-WBD will need to capture audiences’ attention in fresh ways, and that includes broadening theatrical distribution to tap into the magic of the moviegoing experience and create momentum behind films before they reach streaming services.”

Delrahim wrote that with the merger, the companies “will have every incentive to get more films into wider distribution on more movie theater screens—it is how it will compete for audiences across the entertainment ecosystem.” He repeated Paramount CEO David Ellison’s commitment to release 30 films annually and to have a 45-day theatrical window at a minimum for each release.

“That pledge makes sense: theaters are a core part of the combined firm’s strategy to drive engagement both on and off the big screen,” Delrahim wrote.

The letter also repeated other arguments, including that the transaction would better allow Paramount to compete at scale against Netflix. Delrahim noted that Paramount captures “only 5.8% of US SVOD viewership, and WBD 5.0%.9 By comparison, the top three streaming subscription platforms together capture 65% of all U.S. SVOD viewers—Netflix with 32.5%, Disney 16.7%, and Amazon 15.3%. Absent something transformative, neither party is positioned to grow to a scale where they would catch up to the leading streamers.”

Delrahim also challenged figures from Cinema United, the trade association for exhibitors, which is opposing the deal. He cited figures showing that Paramount and Warner Bros. combined represent about 25% of the domestic box office, citing OpusData of 4,000 theatrical releases over the last five years. He claimed that figures from Cinema United, showing a 35% domestic box office share, only captured revenues for the first half of 2025.

“In this environment, Paramount must continue to compete aggressively to find outlets for its films, with many other substitutes available for theaters to fill their screens,” Delrahim wrote.

Delrahim also distinguished the Paramount-WBD merger from the Disney-Fox transaction of 2019, which critics have cited in opposing the merger. The Disney-Fox deal led to a reduction in releases and substantial losses of jobs. Fox was pared down into a unit of The Walt Disney Co.

“Disney acquired Fox just a year before the 2020 pandemic, shortly before launching Disney+, a sea-change event that forced massive changes to every film distributor’s go-to- market strategy,” wrote Delrahim, who signed off on the Disney-Fox transaction in a previous job, as head of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division during Donald Trump’s first term.

Delrahim added, “Paramount’s strategy, in contrast, is informed by the marketplace as it exists in the wake of the pandemic—with three streaming giants dominating audience attention on the one hand, and theaters slowly reemerging as a critical marketing engine and cultural phenomenon that can support Paramount-WBD’s efforts to compete in the entertainment ecosystem on the other.” Delrahim also contended that Disney already was reducing its theatrical releases before it acquired the Fox assets.

One of the concerns raised by opponents is that the deal would usher in massive job loss. Paramount has not made specific job commitments.

Ellison has said that the two studios will operate separately, and in his letter, Delrahim wrote, “Paramount and WBD’s studios will each release at least 15 films per year, and maintain full staff to support production and distribution, to ensure this target is hit. No such commitment was made when Disney acquired Fox.”

Paramount’s letter also noted expressions of support from James Cameron and Adam Aron, the CEO of AMC Entertainment.

A spokesperson for Bonta said in response to the letter, “The Paramount acquisition of Warner Brothers remains an active investigation and we do not have any updates to share at this time.”

Bonta told Deadline in March, “Whenever there’s major corporate consolidation like this, there’s a concern that we might see increased prices, lower wages, reduction in competition, limits in choice, lower quality, all those things. That’s why there is antitrust law in the first place.”

Democratic lawmakers in Washington have warned of the transaction, with Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) holding a recent “spotlight” hearing that featured figures including Mark Ruffalo and documentary filmmaker David Borenstein. More than 5,000 filmmakers, industry professionals and others have signed on to an open letter opposing the transaction, including recent signees Jason Alexander, Tim Robbins, W. Kamau Bell and Lucy Fisher, per organizers.

Semafor first reported on the Paramount letter.

More from Variety:

Paramount Skydance Defends WBD Merger by Arguing That Neither Paramount+ nor HBO Max Could ‘Catch Up’ to Netflix, Disney or Amazon on Their Own

In letter to California attorney general Rob Bonta, Paramount chief legal officer also says deal is unlike Disney-21st Century Fox

Paramount Skydance is continuing to insist that the David Ellison-led company’s $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery will bring “new competitive energy to the entertainment ecosystem,” in the words of its top lawyer — not reduce competition.

On May 7, Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim sent a letter to California Attorney General Rob Bonta, in which Delrahim “reiterate[d] our continued commitment and support to Californian movie theaters and audiences” coming “in response to certain misinformation about the marketplace expressed in recent public commentary.” The letter was reported earlier by Semafor.

Paramount is lobbying the California AG about the alleged pro-competitive benefits of a combined Paramount-WBD as Bonta and other state attorneys general are reviewing the deal for potential antitrust issues. In a call with reporters Monday, Bonta reiterated that the proposed deal has “red flags everywhere” and that his office is examining the merger’s potential to result in higher prices, lower wages and fewer jobs, less choice and less competition. The California AG recently joined with several other states to file a lawsuit seeking to block the Nexstar-Tegna deal.

In the letter, Delrahim argued that Paramount and WBD together will “drive meaningful improvements for movie theaters and their audiences” and he reiterated Ellison’s commitment that the merged company will release at least 30 films per year.

In addition, he said that Paramount+ and HBO Max separately do not have the scale to “compete effectively” against bigger subscription streaming players Netflix, Disney+ and Hulu, and Amazon’s Prime Video.

Both Paramount+ and HBO Max “lack the scale to compete effectively against the leading SVODs [subscription video-on-demand services],” wrote Delrahim. “Absent something transformative, neither party is positioned to grow to a scale where they would catch up to the leading streamers.”

Citing Nielsen estimates for December 2025, he said Paramount had only 5.8% of U.S. subscription VOD viewership, and Warner Bros. Discovery had 5.0%. “By comparison, the top three streaming subscription platforms together capture 65% of all U.S. SVOD viewers — Netflix with 32.5%, Disney 16.7%, and Amazon 15.3%,” he wrote. If the deal is completed, Paramount plans to combine Paramount+ and WBD’s HBO Max in some way.

Meanwhile, Delrahim downplayed the market power of the companies’ movie studios if they were consolidated. “Paramount’s relationship with theater operators will not materially change after the merger,” he maintained. “Combined, Paramount and WBD only represent about 25% of the domestic box office, with at least a half dozen other distributors competing to show their films in theaters” including Disney, Universal, Sony, Amazon MGM Studios and Lionsgate. The 25% market share estimate is based on domestic box office grosses for 4,000 films over the past five years as compiled by OpusData.

“In this environment, Paramount must continue to compete aggressively to find outlets for its films, with many other substitutes available for theaters to fill their screens,” Delrahim wrote.

Delrahim, who before joining Paramount had advised Skydance Media on the Paramount Global acquisition, also said that Paramount-WBD is not comparable to Disney’s $71 billion deal to acquire 21st Century Fox assets that closed in 2019.

He noted: “Even before it acquired Fox, Disney started reducing its theatrical releases, releasing only 7 and 10 films theatrically in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Paramount, in contrast, has already increased its theatrical releases dramatically and has committed to distributing 30+ feature films following the WBD merger. Paramount and WBD’s studios will each release at least 15 films per year, and maintain full staff to support production and distribution, to ensure this target is hit. No such commitment was made when Disney acquired Fox.”

He also argued that “Disney’s motivation for acquiring Fox was largely about acquiring majority control of Hulu,” whereas “Paramount’s motivation for acquiring WBD, in contrast, is maximizing output across the entertainment ecosystem (including theatrical release) to compete more effectively with much larger competitors in Netflix, Disney, and Amazon. Increasing production and distribution volume is a key lever that Paramount has identified to achieve internal revenue targets for the combined company.”

That said, more films in theaters does not necessarily mean more money. Paramount, in reporting Q1 2026 earnings, said it expects “significantly lower theatrical revenue year-over-year due to lower average box office revenue per film across more releases” in 2026. A big part of that is that the studio faces a difficult year-over-year comparison because of 2025’s “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning” (which took in nearly $600 million at the global box office). But it shows that simply churning out more titles doesn’t actually correlate with bigger economic impact.

Last month, Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders overwhelmingly voted in favor of the Paramount deal. The pact still requires approval by European regulators.

Paramount, before it won the WBD deal, said its proposed WBD takeover had cleared a milestone at the Justice Department, after the expiration of the statutory waiting period following Paramount’s “certification of compliance” with the DOJ’s second request for information under the Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust act. However, the DOJ has the latitude to challenge a merger even after the HSR waiting period expiration. In March, the acting head of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, Omeed Assefi, said the Paramount-WBD deal will “absolutely not” be on a fast-track for approval due to political reasons, in the context of the Ellison family’s friendly ties to Trump.

###

Shop Paramount+ at ParamountShop.com

Stream a Mountain of Entertainment, including your Nickelodeon favorites on Paramount+! Try it FREE at ParamountPlus.com!

Add NickALive! to Google Preferred Sources



Follow NickALive! on TwitterRedditInstagramFacebookGoogle NewsTumblrvia RSS and more for the latest Nickelodeon and Paramount Plus News and Highlights!